WHO now says theory that COVID-19 leaked from Chinese lab should be studied more

I'm sure China will offer their full cooperation.


drummerboy said:

I'm sure China will offer their full cooperation.

Not to mention Fauci.


terp said:

drummerboy said:

I'm sure China will offer their full cooperation.

Not to mention Fauci.

Right. As if Fauci has anything to contribute to this matter.


drummerboy said:

terp said:

drummerboy said:

I'm sure China will offer their full cooperation.

Not to mention Fauci.

Right. As if Fauci has anything to contribute to this matter.

Nothing to see here


terp said:

drummerboy said:

terp said:

drummerboy said:

I'm sure China will offer their full cooperation.

Not to mention Fauci.

Right. As if Fauci has anything to contribute to this matter.

Nothing to see here

That's the "man-made virus" theory.

The "lab-leak" theory isn't about creation of the virus, just the source of the initial outbreak. By the way, the actual text of the article explains what's meant by the headline -

Yet in a report released Thursday, WHO’s expert group said “key pieces of data” to explain how the pandemic began were still missing. The scientists said the group would “remain open to any and all scientific evidence that becomes available in the future to allow for comprehensive testing of all reasonable hypotheses.”

Identifying a disease’s source in animals typically takes years. It took more than a decade for scientists to pinpoint the species of bats that were the natural reservoir for SARS, a relative of COVID-19.

WHO’s expert group also noted that since lab accidents in the past have triggered some outbreaks, the highly politicized theory could not be discounted.

That's all it is.


nohero said:

terp said:

drummerboy said:

terp said:

drummerboy said:

I'm sure China will offer their full cooperation.

Not to mention Fauci.

Right. As if Fauci has anything to contribute to this matter.

Nothing to see here

That's the "man-made virus" theory.

The "lab-leak" theory isn't about creation of the virus, just the source of the initial outbreak. By the way, the actual text of the article explains what's meant by the headline 

A distinction without a difference.  Is your theory that the source of the novel virus was wild animals, but it somehow escaped from the lab?



In order to add a comment – you must Join this community – Click here to do so.

Advertise here!

Sponsored Business

Find Business