ajc said:
If you hear it from Tucker, you know whatever he said, it's the truth...
omg...he's baaaaaack!
ajc said:
If you hear it from Tucker, you know whatever he said, it's the truth...
I recently posted Tucker's interview with Tucker Max on Facebook. Has anyone seen it?
Dennis_Seelbach said:
omg...he's baaaaaack!
I heard there's someone who took my place. So, I thought I should check it out...
Dennis_Seelbach said:
Why would anyone choose to read his drivel, or yours, on fb or anywhere else. Go back in your hole.
Well that's not very friendly. You must be one of the resident bad ****...
Omg- the return of ajc! Please post your favorite word of wisdom from Tucker - where is he these days?
Tucker recently came out against evolution.
Liberal youtube had a field day with him
He's such a putz.
ajc said:
If you hear it from Tucker, you know whatever he said, it's the truth...
ajc said:
If you hear it from Tucker, you know whatever he said, it's the truth...
ajc said:
If you hear it from Tucker, you know whatever he said, it's the truth...
Not according to his own lawyers it ain't.
Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way.
Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
mtierney said:
Welcome back, ajc! How are you and how is your B&B doing?
Hello MT, thanks for the nice greeting. You're obviously not one of those left-wing, leftovers from when I last hung out on MOL. They were such a bore, always the same old talking points. I started this thread on Tucker, first because he's a truth seaker, and also because he's the Conservative version of 60 Minutes. I trust him tell the truth, and tell it like it is.
ajc said:
mtierney said:
Welcome back, ajc! How are you and how is your B&B doing?
Hello MT, thanks for the nice greeting. You're obviously not one of those left-wing, leftovers from when I last hung out on MOL. They were such a bore, always the same old talking points. I started this thread on Tucker, first because he's a truth seaker, and also because he's the Conservative version of 60 Minutes. I trust him tell the truth, and tell it like it is.
did you even read ridski's post? his lawyers literally argued in court that tucker is a professional bullshitter.
trumpers are the most ridiculous people on the planet, apart from trump himself, of course.
ajc said:
You're obviously not one of those left-wing, leftovers from when I last hung out on MOL. They were such a bore, always the same old talking points.
100% pure projection
ajc said:
Hello MT, thanks for the nice greeting. You're obviously not one of those left-wing, leftovers from when I last hung out on MOL. They were such a bore, always the same old talking points. I started this thread on Tucker, first because he's a truth seaker, and also because he's the Conservative version of 60 Minutes. I trust him tell the truth, and tell it like it is.
Bless your heart, ajc.
Renovated apartment in Bloomfield
3 Bd | 2Full Ba
$2,850
Coffee mugs $1.50
More info
If you hear it from Tucker, you know whatever he said, it's the truth...